<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Grand National Claims Another</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.scouseveg.co.uk/2008/04/08/the-grand-national-claims-another/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.scouseveg.co.uk/2008/04/08/the-grand-national-claims-another/</link>
	<description>Liverpool Vegetarians and Vegans</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Jan 2012 22:25:04 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Maria</title>
		<link>http://www.scouseveg.co.uk/2008/04/08/the-grand-national-claims-another/comment-page-1/#comment-34654</link>
		<dc:creator>Maria</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Apr 2009 17:17:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scouseveg.co.uk/2008/04/08/the-grand-national-claims-another/#comment-34654</guid>
		<description>The BBC are in trouble again, this time because the jockey Liam Treadwell&#039;s feelings were hurt over comments made regarding his bad teeth! Who cares!!! The BBC has done its best to promote the Aintree Grand National, with hour upon hour of news airtime turned over to it for weeks beforehand. As a licence payer, I would like to know how this blatant advertising, without any mention of the deaths of the animal victims involved from heart attack and injury is purported to be &quot;impartial&quot; reporting?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The BBC are in trouble again, this time because the jockey Liam Treadwell&#8217;s feelings were hurt over comments made regarding his bad teeth! Who cares!!! The BBC has done its best to promote the Aintree Grand National, with hour upon hour of news airtime turned over to it for weeks beforehand. As a licence payer, I would like to know how this blatant advertising, without any mention of the deaths of the animal victims involved from heart attack and injury is purported to be &#8220;impartial&#8221; reporting?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

